blank
comment 8 Comments
Posted on Last updated

Inside the Masters’ TV ratings plunge: What it means for golf

As it turns out, the least interested party in the Masters television ratings is … the Masters.

As most golf fans know, Augusta National does not care very much about maximizing its profits from hosting the Masters. If they did, the club would make their pimento cheese sandwiches more expensive than $1.50 — or charge CBS more than pennies on the dollar to broadcast the tournament each year.




Which is perhaps why outgoing CBS chairman Sean McManus didn’t seem all that worried about what the ratings would mean for either tournament or network last week, no matter how high or low they were.

“I do know the Masters will be the highest-rated golf tournament of the year…” he said coyly. “Because it is every single year.”

But the truth, of course, is more nuanced. The Masters TV ratings may not mean a ton to Augusta National, but they mean a great deal to the other stakeholders in golf. The Masters is one of the few objective tests of golf’s popularity, and because the tournament is the most-watched in golf every year, the Masters ratings also provide us with a sense of the sport’s TV ceiling. In a year like 2024 when so much of professional golf has seen significant ratings dips, the Masters also tells us a bit about the health of the professional golf product at large.

Right now, it seems pro golf’s health is declining. On Tuesday morning, CBS released viewership data that showed Scottie Scheffler’s Masters victory was the third-lowest-rated tournament telecast in history (ahead of only the Covid years of 2020 and 2021). Below is an extended sampling from the Hot Mic Newsletter discussing those ratings developments, particularly what they mean for the sport’s other stakeholders in the wake of the news.




WE SAID A WEEK AGO…

That anything under 10 million average viewers for CBS’s Masters coverage would indicate golf officially has a TV ratings problem. Only two Masters have ever rated lower than that mark and both came during the Covid years of ’20 and ’21. Changes to Nielsen’s out-of-home viewership data in the years since then, and growth in golf’s overall popularity, indicated that even OK ratings would cross the 10 million viewer threshold.

WHAT HAPPENED?

CBS’s latest report showed that 9.59 million average viewers tuned in to Scottie Scheffler’s Sunday triumph. That qualifies as … well less than 10 million. And even if out-of-home viewing data was down, it doesn’t account for a drop of nearly 2.5 million viewers from Jon Rahm’s 2023 victory.

THE PROBLEM

The 2024 Masters Sunday TV number is some 20 percent lower than last year’s audience, which is about in line with how far the PGA Tour’s ratings have fallen for much of 2024. The CBS number shows those lower Tour ratings haven’t been a fluke.

But the bigger issue is that golf’s ratings are now down across the board, even in events when the best players come together, and even when other sports are flat to up in their ratings. The issue isn’t as simple as the PGA Tour dealing with bad weather, and the solution isn’t as simple as reunifying the game’s biggest players more often. Pro golf seems to have lost some of its viewership base, and that’s bad news.




BUT JAMES, WHAT ABOUT THE PEOPLE WATCHING ON THE MASTERS APP?

Yep, there were a lot of them, and they’re not being counted in CBS’s TV ratings. But the point of reporting ratings isn’t to find every single person who watched a telecast on every platform (though that would be nice!). The point is to give us a point of reference about how an event is performing relative to historical trends. The numbers help us tell a story.

The CBS Masters numbers mean something to us because we have the context of previous numbers to compare them against, and these numbers are down considerably relative to the Masters’ previous ratings.

Of course there’s a bigger audience out there. But I’d be stone-cold stunned if 20 percent of CBS viewers migrated to the Masters app in one year. More likely is that 20 percent of last year’s TV viewers decided they had better ways to spend their time. And why did they decide that?




REASON No. 1

Golf simply isn’t an overly compelling TV product right now. Too few performing stars, too many controversies and headaches, too little clarity on the shape of the future of the sport — it’s all a bad cocktail for the viewership group representing a fifth of golf’s TV audience.

In short, the LIV drama was a bright blue flame for intrigue, but it may have faded into fan fatigue.

REASON No. 2

Scottie Scheffler simply isn’t a compelling TV golfer right now. He is unrelenting in his dominance and uninteresting in his interviews — a combination that could work for pro golf audiences if he lands three or five or 10 more big wins, but that isn’t working now. I’d bet a lot of golf fans changed the channel once they saw him take a commanding lead on the 12th green.

It’s great to see anyone reach this level of dominance, but until he starts winning at a historic clip, he’ll be a hard guy for golf to lean on for TV interest.




REASON No. 3

Fewer people are watching live television than ever before, and historical viewership trends are pointed in the wrong direction. Out-of-home viewing — which has been captured more accurately by Nielsen over the last 18 months and has resulted in temporary ratings “bumps” across the board — has helped supplement those deficits. Last year’s Masters, which fell during Easter, was greeted by a greater-than-usual out-of-home audience, but this year’s non-Easter Sunday finish resulted in smaller OOH numbers, and by extension, smaller overall viewership.

REASONS No. 4 to infinity

Fans love a star, and outside of Scheffler — who, if he is, is only at the beginning of his reign — golf’s best players just haven’t been relevant enough from week to week.

Rory McIlroy hasn’t won on the PGA Tour in 10 months. Jordan Spieth, Justin Thomas, Xander Schauffele and Patrick Cantlay haven’t won in two years. Collin Morikawa hasn’t won an event televised in daytime in the United States in three years (his victory in the middle of the night at last fall’s Zozo Championship notwithstanding).

The rest of golf’s stars — Bryson, Rahm, Brooks — are spending most of the year playing on LIV, a tour that in recent weeks has struggled to clip 200,000 average viewers on the CW, per Nielsen. That, for the non-ratings inclined, is roughly the same number of viewers who watched some of the lesser mid-week, mid-day men’s and women’s college basketball conference tournament games — and is less than a third of the audience averaged by the WNBA last season on ABC.



Article originally appeared on: Golf.com

8 thoughts on “Inside the Masters’ TV ratings plunge: What it means for golf

  1. blank

    The migration to streaming platforms for the Thurs-Friday majority coverage does not bode well in older demographics. This migration will not cause an increase in subscriptions to streaming to see a single sports event–but it will diminish the desire to support the abbreviated network broadcasts on the weekend.

  2. blank

    The reason is the Saudi’s and the selfish money grubbing players that left the PGA have totally made many, many golfers fed up with golf in general. LIV is a cancer and Jay Monahan needs to be fired and the PGA need to walk away from any “deals” with LIV

    1. blank

      Ever since live I’ve lost interest. I don’t know half players on the leader board. I guess I was naive to think golf was still a gentlemen’s game with gentlemen playing it only to find out like every other sport it’s about greed and money.

  3. blank

    With the limited windows for viewing the Masters when being telecast by CBS, it is no wonder that viewership is down. With Golf Channel not being allowed to delay broadcast the tournament, it punishes viewers that can’t watch the live broadcast on CBS.

  4. blank

    There’s no single reason for the loss of viewership, but it’s mainly due to the PGA Tour’s amateurish attempts to demonize LIV Golf by characterizing LIV players as traitors. You have to be a special kind of stupid to not understand that the majority of PGA players would go there if offered the right amount of money. And it doesn’t help that the broadcast format (featured group, WTF?), is horrible.
    I’m a golf nut so yes, I did watch “some” of it. But not Thursday or Friday, or even most of Saturday.

  5. blank

    I watched a majority of it through the Masters app. Watching each shot of the players i want to view, made it more enjoyable.

    1. blank

      I agree. CBS limited viewing time. Masters.com was great. I watched all day, every day from my computer.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *