Annika Sorenstam, the Hall of Famer and 10-time major champion playing in her first tournament since 2008, shot a three-over 75 during Thursday’s first round of the Gainbridge LPGA.
It should have been one stroke better.
On the par-4 5th hole at Lake Nona Golf and Country Club, Sorenstam hit her tee shot left, and her ball settled underneath the gate of a fence of a neighboring property, but remained in bounds, according to Golfweek’s Beth Ann Nichols. After consulting with a rules official, Sorenstam took an unplayable drop and a penalty stroke, which led to a triple-bogey 7. According to Nichols, Sorenstam had wanted to open the gate and hit her second shot, but the official determined she couldn’t.
In fact, Sorenstam could have.
According to a boundary object interpretation in the Rules of Golf, “a gate for getting through a boundary wall or fence is not part of the boundary object. Such a gate is an obstruction unless the Committee chooses to define it as an integral object.” That rule was updated at the start of 2019.
Rules fiasco brewing involving Annika Sorenstam’s triple from yesterday. Story coming soon … pic.twitter.com/q1E2GBhQWM
— Beth Ann Nichols (@GolfweekNichols) February 26, 2021
The LPGA addressed the error on Friday through a statement, but said it could not correct the mistake.
“Regarding the Ruling given to Annika Sorenstam on the fifth hole during the first round of the 2021 Gainbridge LPGA, the official on scene linked the word ‘integral’ to the gate meant that it could not be moved,” the statement said. “This was an error under the definition of an Immovable Obstruction in the Rules of Golf. The gate is considered moveable if proven to be unlocked (Rule 16), and therefore could have been moved to allow the player to hit the shot.
“The option to rescind the penalty is not available under the Rules of Golf. The official met the player immediately after her second round to explain the mistake and apologize.”
Sorenstam, after shooting a one-under 71 in Friday’s second round, said the rules official “said he was wrong.” As of this writing, Sorenstam was projected to make the cut for the weekend on the number.
“He said, ‘This is going to hurt me. This is eating me inside,’” Sorenstam said. “I said, ‘Please, please don’t feel that way. I appreciate it.’ He said, ‘I won’t make that mistake again.’ I said, ‘Well, I won’t hit there anymore.’
“You know, those things happen. The rules have changed. That’s the way it goes.”
Article originally appeared on: Golf.com
Golf rules negate the ability to rescind a penalty error? We goofed, tough break! Something wrong with that picture.
I agree it doesn’t seem fair but we don’t know what the outcome would have been. Anika may have ended with more than a triple bogey. There are options to play two shots when the rules aren’t clear and using the score from the correct ruling. But there would have been little reason to doubt Arles ranger during a professional event.